Denver – The CEO of MyPillow Mike Lindell and his legal team must explain themselves to a federal judge in Colorado after they discovered a recent summary they presented to fake court cases as evidence.
According to court documents, federal judge Nina Wang found about 30 flawed quotes in the brief Lindell Legal Team in February. The faults range from the wrong to the “non -existing cases of cases”.
Court documents show that the summary was created by artificial intelligence.
“You can use it,” David Lin said.
Lynn is a lawyer in Denver. He is not involved in the case, but he said that the entire society of law would closely monitor.
Lynn said: “Many people expected part of the legal profession to disappear because it will be replaced by artificial intelligence, which can write a summary in five minutes that the lawyer will take for five weeks to be born.”
According to Lane, many Amnesty International lawyers use the time it takes to formulate court documents. However, he said that technology is not good enough to replace the entire legal employees.
Lynn said: “There is something called hallucinations, artificial intelligence, which simply makes things.” “If any lawyer is ridiculous enough to rely only on artificial intelligence to write a summary, they deserve to keep it in contempt.”
Wang Lindel, lawyer Christopher Kachorov and another member of the legal team, Jennifer Demaster, has been commanded to show the reason not to face court penalties and refer him to take disciplinary action.
“There is nothing wrong with using artificial intelligence when using it properly.”
Kachouroff objected to the fact that the relevant document was a previous draft by mistake because of a “human error”. The last file claiming that they did not realize the error until Judge Wang was interrogated without notice in the open court after 55 days of his presentation.
“There was no lack of diligence by the defense lawyer, nor intention to mislead this court at all,” he said in the Friday file.
The concerned summary is part of the continuous defamation issue that involves a former Dominional voting official that was presented against Lindel in 2022.