City Council meetings can come out anywhere quickly by public comments, some of which can be rude, vulgar or discriminatory.
Take, for example, the Los Angeles City Council, a legislative body that helps to rule one of the most important cities of America, which meets three times a week.
During those meetings, there are “a few speakers” who “routinely cast racist insults, anti -Semitic phrases or other forms of verbal abuse of members of the city council,” According to the Los Angeles Times.
La said: “They attacked the looks of the officials, their weight, their clothes, the sexual orientation, and the procedures regularly toured.”
Thus, the lawmakers in the city take the first steps towards the end of the offensive language.
like I mentioned for the first time by the current column writer in Westasid John IdadiOn Friday, seven members of the Council signed a joint proposal prohibiting the use of two words: the word N-racist mortar-and the word C, which the La Times described as “sexual cliche”.
The proposal, which was made by the Speaker of Marxi Harris Dawson, will make it so that the audience members can be removed from meetings or is forbidden from that future to use these words over and over again.
Speaking to the Times, Harris Dawson said that the members of the audience who use the offensive language “put the cold on civil participation” and discouraged people from attending the meetings.
“It is a language, anywhere outside this building where there are no four armed guards, it will harm you if these things say in public places,” said Harris Dawson, at the Times.
The head of the city council – who was walking in the spotlight earlier this year, erupted when the destroyed forest fires erupted while the mayor of Los Angeles, the Chargé d’Affaires during the journey of Mayor Karen Bass to Ghana – also told him that he and his colleagues may add more banned words to the proposal in the coming weeks.
Passing the proposal may not be easy, as some legal analysts worry that the proposal violates 1street The amendment rights may not survive the challenge in court.
Professor of Laws of Liula Marimont University, Professor Aaron E. Kaplan for the Times: “I can feel some sympathy for the city council.” “But I feel it will be very easy for the court to say,” You can not only get a list of banned words when there is a lot of other words that are “completely offensive” [and] Then discrimination is against some views. ”
Another law expert, the College of Law at the University of California, Berkeley, Dean of Irwin Chimurinski, stated that the two words are in the proposal, although it is very abusive, protected by 1street amendment.
For now, Harris Dawson says that his suggestion will look forward to eliminating the word N and the word C from meetings first, as these two words in particular “have no political value” and it is intended only to insult a person.