Austin (KXAN) – Like many Ostnett, the region’s lawyer has long been remembered and public employee Margaret Moore Learning for murders in the yogurt store.
She said, “It was one of the most horrific crimes that Austin witnessed during my presence in Austin.” “I was in the DA office for four years as an assistant lawyer in the province – I dealt with a number of murder cases that were very prominent – but nothing, nothing corresponding to this terrible crime of this society.”
Decades, as a newlywood lawyer in Travis Province in Travis in 2017, Moore established a special team of prosecutors and detectives in the Cold Cases Unit at Austin Cooperation Police-with the aim of the discovery of the killing of these four girls inside a burning company in 1991.
Moore described the issue as a top priority for her and her first assistance, Mindy Montford – who continued to launch a cold state unit at the state level of the Prosecutor’s Office in Texas.
She recalls, “We lived with her. Almost every day we were talking about, as you know,” What? What? What can we do? How can we get there? “Remember.
So, after learning APD, Robert Eugene Prars has identified a suspect and tied him to crime by testing DNA and projectiles, Moore said it was emotional.
He was reflected in interviewing the families of the four girls, immediately after taking office.
She said: “The family wanted the provincial prosecutor’s office to reopen the case and try to reach a decision, and that this was a very easy commitment.” “I am my mother and Jeddah. And their pain? It was real on that day as it was. So it was really easy to say,” of course, we are happy. We want to do that, and we will never give it up. ”So, they were very grateful, and we went from there.”
At that stage, the families of the victims had passed through several trials and years from the legal successor, and they were largely focused on four suspects who were arrested after eight years of crime.
In 2009, the new DNA test revealed the existence of an unknown man’s Jenny file at the crime scene that did not match these suspects. The identity of that person has become a major barrier in the case and the main focus of Moore.
They collected all the evidence from the case to one conference room, which people in the office described it at the time as a “war room”.
She said: “They only started to score – knowing what was still there and what you know, in an attempt to get all of this in order and log in.” “But the primary goal from the beginning was to determine the source of S. Provel, which caused the case to be rejected.”
Listen to the above interview to hear the full conversation with Moore.