Groups continue to oppose proposed Lincoln Street bridge that would celebrate Colorado's 150th

Denver (KDVR) – next year, Colorado 150 years old, and a pedestrian corridor that would connect Colorado State Capitol and CIVIC to help celebrate the teacher.

The project was extracted from criticism from many groups, but others expressed support. On the project site, a series of four questions was asked:

  • Should the project continue?
  • If the project does not continue, what should be in its place?
  • If you follow Colorado the corridor, do you have to continue as planned or modified?
  • 2026 Credit or lower: Are you more excited about the 150th anniversary of the state or the American anniversary 250?

The survey can be found at the bottom of the project website “Reactions” page, which is here.

The corridor will form a ring in the northern part of the Lincoln Park of the Old Souvenir warriors before crossing Lincoln Street and ends with the steps of the Colorado Capitol building. The idea is to show artists and history in Colorado and also “Bridge City and State” by linking the city’s lands to government lands.

Denver’s historical history, a non -profit institution that focuses on preserving urban history, is called a “useless” and “farce” bridge, and he said that Denver was not on the plane, so it is now planned to connect government lands to the state’s lands.

This is because the bridge will cost an estimated $ 18 million, according to the Colorado Governor’s office, with an additional $ 10 million in the park promotions planned during the next few years. Denver says the bridge will cost up to $ 20 million for construction.

The ruler’s office said that the bridge would be Funding with $ 8.5 million from the country It was conceived as a public/private partnership.

“In the face of criticism about the clear lack of purpose, supporters of the bridge controlled the need for the possibility of access to the wheelchairs. However, the possibility of access to the original concept document has not been mentioned,” wrote historical President Denver John Devinbo. “To agree, the only defender to reach the project support had retracted his views and stated that he was” used “. The state had a budget deficit before the approval of the” Great Great Law Law “in the capital, and the ruler highlighted that this would increase the bad situation.

Colorado Preservation Inc. Against the project, I wrote a message that opposes the bridge.

“Capitol Land and Civic Center has been carefully planned as Colors can meet, to a march, to reduce, to celebrate, to see and see,” wrote Jennifer Orego Charles, Executive Director of Colorado Conservation. “The open promoter, balanced planning, and clear opinions between the Capitol and the mountains were not just aesthetic options; it was supposed to express the values of democracy, access, and civil pride. Changing this carefully designed landscape weakens the message that was built for transportation.”

Defenbau referred to the 5280 course as a possible initiative that can be supported instead of the bridge.

“It was conceived in 2017 and was promoted by a partnership in downtown Denver, the city and Denver Province, the corridor aims to link neighborhoods and link people by re -imagining the unused streets in the city’s main city experience, unifying urban life with the outdoor Colorado culture.” “The path passes through the governmental Capitol lands, which takes place on Shermann Street. What is the best way to achieve the original concept of the infantry bridge, to symbolically connect the city and the state, by integrating the story of Colorado into the course of 5280 adjacent to the Capitol state.”

Leave a Comment